Is Snapdragon 865+ better than Exynos?
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 has a antutu benchmark score of 600051 and Samsung Exynos 990 has antutu score of 534251. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 comes up with 8 cores, 2840 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Samsung Exynos 990 has 8 cores and 2730 MHz frequency.
Is MediaTek Dimensity 1200 is better than Snapdragon?
Performance Comparison The MediaTek Dimensity 1200 is undoubtedly the most powerful processor from the company and is also one of the first processors from the brand capable of reaching up to 3GHz clock speed. In comparison, the Snapdragon 888 SoC has a slightly lower CPU clock speed of 2.84GHz.
What is antutu score of 720G?
The AnTuTu scores of both the chipsets are around the 2,80,000 mark with the 720G chipset smartphone scoring slightly higher than the 730G chipset smartphone. Geekbench scores are similar and the 720G is slightly higher than the 730G by a marginal amount.
What is the antutu score of 9611?
Samsung Exynos 9611 has a antutu benchmark score of 183257 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 has antutu score of 254669.
Is 865 or 1000+ better?
Both the Dimensity 1000 and the Snapdragon 865 support 5G, but the two trade wins in the areas of network support and integration. The Snapdragon 865 supports both mmWave and sub-6Ghz flavors of 5G. Meanwhile, the Dimensity 1000 only supports sub-6Ghz.
What is the antutu score of Exynos 2100?
Samsung Exynos 2100 has a antutu benchmark score of 687807 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 has antutu score of 286407. Samsung Exynos 2100 comes up with 8 cores, 2900 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 has 8 cores and 2000 MHz frequency.
Is Dimensity 1200 Good for PUBG mobile?
Both are powerful, but the 1200 can push that bit further when it comes to certain features. MediaTek claims it will run PUBG Mobile at a steady 90fps; the 1100 at 60fps. That may well depend on RAM, but there’s support for up to four channels of LPDDR4 at 2133MHz, so up to four lots of 4GB making up to 16GB total.
Does Dimensity 1200 support LPDDR5?
Both the Dimensity 1200 and 1100 feature a Mali-G77 GPU along with a third-generation APU which is said to provide a 12.5 percent uplift in performance over the APU in the Dimensity 1000+. Interestingly, neither of the new Dimensity SoCs support LPDDR5 memory, and instead support LPDDR4x memory at 2133MHz.
Is 730G better than 720G?
An AnTuTu benchmark result shows the Snapdragon 720G is actually better in terms of performance than the Snapdragon 730G. For Geekbench, the Snapdragon 720G scores higher in the single-core performance but scores just a tiny bit lower than the Snapdragon 730G in multi-core performance.
Which is better G95 vs 720G?
Mediatek g95 is slightly solwer than Snapdragon 720g. mediatek g95 is the newest and latest chip of mediatek but Snapdragon 720g is lightly older. mediatek is not able to beat 720g but Snapdragon have more power than 720g like 730, 732, 765, 845, 865, 865+ never mediatek beat Snapdragon.
Is Exynos 9611 better than Snapdragon 720G?
Benchmark Scores In Geekbench, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G scores a single-core score of 571 points and a multi-core score of 1676. On the other hand, the Exynos 9611 scores a single-core score of 305 points and a multi-core score of 1177 points. So, Qualcomm’s 720G is the clear winner in terms of performance.
Is Exynos 9611 better than Snapdragon 730G?
As you see, Snapdragon outperforms the Exynos 9611 in nearly all categories. This is to be expected, as 730g is a newer chip built on a faster 8nm fabrication process. However, it’s also slightly more expensive than the Exynos 9611.
What is AnTuTu score in Android?
AnTuTu Benchmark Score. Being the most famous and pervasive benchmark of the Android world, AnTuTu has a simplistic workflow, where on pressing a button “Run benchmark”, It would trigger a host of benchmarking procedures internally, quantifying the performance on a system based on several different system tests.
What is AnTuTu benchmark?
AnTuTu Benchmark can run a full test of a key project, through the “Memory Performance”,”CPU Integer Performance”,”CPU Floating point Performance”,”2D Graphics Performance”,”Storage read/writed”,”Database IO” performance testing on the mobile phone Performance of the hardware to make score.
What is the problem with AnTuTu?
The issue with AnTuTu is that it is perceived as a full system benchmark and is expected to provide a full system benchmark, whereas all it lives up to is testing individual components of the hardware, on crude parameters that don’t amount to much in real world and based on the weightage of individual parameters, a score is calculated.
What is the difference between AnTuTu and Geekbench?
GeekBench is a bit limited though in its approach and just measures certain aspects of CPU performance and memory. It is available on iOS, MacOS, Android, Linux and Windows too. Relatively, GeekBench isn’t that bad or misleading/misunderstood compared to AnTuTu.